Ethics doctor patient dating
Sexual or romantic relationships with former patients are unethical if the physician uses or exploits trust, knowledge, emotions, or influence derived from the previous professional relationship." Note that this last statement leaves open the possibility that such relations might not be unethical if the physician doesn't exploit aspects of the former relationship.Also, the AMA is silent here about former lovers becoming current patients. Colorado's Medical Practice Act specifies a six-month "waiting period" after a professional relationship has ceased before a sexual one may begin.Launching the revised AMA Code of Ethics in Canberra today, AMA President, Dr Kerryn Phelps, said the doctor-patient relationship was more of a partnership than ever before.Dr Phelps said the revised Code - updated for the first time since 1996 - reflects the contemporary nature of this partnership.The revised AMA Code of Ethics was launched jointly by AMA President, Dr Kerryn Phelps, and Vice-President and Chair of the AMA's Medico-Legal Committee, Dr Trevor Mudge, at Parliament House in Canberra.The AMA Code of Ethics can be viewed on the AMA website at AMA Code of Ethics.
"Doctors and patients both have rights as well as responsibilities.
"The doctor-patient partnership is all about achieving the best possible patient health outcomes and, at the same time, protecting the doctor's clinical judgment and independence through greater trust, respect, and communication.
"Through our Code of Ethics, the AMA acknowledges and supports the need for patient autonomy - the right of patients to participate in their own health care decisions.
A therapist who gratifies his or her own needs by exploiting a patient's vulnerability destroys the trust essential to treatment." The APA seems to imply that all sexual relationships are inherently exploitative. From the administrative justice standpoint, a "no overlap" rule is simple to administer and superficially unassailable. As a credentials reviewer, I've seen this clause invoked far more often by scorned lovers than by innocent parties.
The inflexible letter of the law weighs unfairly on some defendants, and sometimes compels a disciplinary body to impose sanctions that don't fit a case's nuances.